If the fathomless Tao is the source of all, what created the Tao and what created that creator, and on and on? You could philosophise about that endlessly. Lets’s say infinity/eternity is just there to enjoy it, so let’s get out on the balcony under the night sky and have a beer or a coffee or a splif or a ciggi or a glas of water, and let the all-and-all guide and let the spirit flow trough you, and enjoy the night.
Could it even be that our fantasies, dreams and thoughts, are some, or can become some reality in some other dimension or in a parallel universe or in some other multiverse or another „reality“. For example, could there exist a multiverse where the physical laws are such, that there really exists a disc world?
If god is a dreamer or thinker, and all its thoughts which can become our thoughts or vice versa, manifest in a multiverse or „reality“, there could exist multiverses with total different laws of physics or maybe no physics at all, maybe only total spiritual realities!
Because the diversity of existence maybe wants to exits somehow, somewhere. (Maybe everything possible is allowed to exist somehow somewhere -> fecundity principle).
(please regard the interconnectedness of everything through different means and my tract about nothing/ness)
If this would be a pure energy/matter universe, it would be a prison, because it would lack the freedom of the spiritual realm (Geistige Welt; Geist means Ghost, Spirit, mind, consciousness) (never forget that words have a meaning that describe something out of the world the human found out)!
Sometimes you’re seen as mentally ill when you’re quietly sitting on your couch ruminating and thinkink about life and its meaning and not getting things done, and other times you’re seen as mentally ill when your upbeat, dancing on the streets and talking about seemingly „crazy“ stuff and not getting anything done, but when you’re living an avarege life, working, sleeping, eating, watching telly, fucking and so forth as the system wants you to, you’re deemed normal and healthy! Is that the opression of the system on „crazy“ people if you’re no performance oriented benefit to the system you get punished and tortured into obeying the system? Is that the capitalist democratic fascism as executed by the majority on minorities seen in the example of „psychos“? Is that the difference between an broad path to damnation and the hard rocky road to salvation, Jesus spoke of?
Since the introduction of shock-pictures on tobacco products should mostly have had a dissuasive influnece on people to not use tobacco, but as we know through autogenous training and other psychological/spiritual techniques of selfinfluencing (e.g. meditation on health), repetative, subconscious influences can have an influence on the soul so also on the body. So when you often see shock images of sick people, doesn’t that implicate that after some time of influence on your subconsciousness you somehow are more prone to such sicknesses, though it is shown in studies that tobacco has a positive influence on „schizophrenics“ (the soul)? What does that say about a psychiatrist repetative storytelling of altered states of consciousness as a sickness and „halucinations“ as not existant (but as proposed in other posts and pages being not so)? What does that say about the repetative storytelling of psychiatrist that neuroleptics help against „symptoms“ through building up over the course of some weeks a level of the agent and after some weeks stopping the „psychosis“, though it is known that the „dopaminblockers“ immediatly enter the neuronal gaps and block the transmittors, and that is said that it saved so much lifes, though we also know that it killed and (spiritually, physically and pschologically) destroyed people, and me also at my first longer encounter with the otherworld i could also without the help of neuroleptics could return to everyday reality after soeme weeks of alternative help? Wouldn’t you internalize the role of sick person and therefor feel so, but as i mostly learned to know so called „schizos“ being positive about their initial/first experiences only becoming later negative (maybe because of the psychiatrists storytelling and drugs?)? What does that say about the repetitions in the media about dangers from this and that and that a capitalist democratic fascist system is indespensable and without it, we would loose our wealth and security, and that it brought so much advance, but we forget how much destruction and also (psychological and physical) suffering it brought, especially when most of the people relax in front of the tv or other media after a hard days work and so the higher parts of consciousness are closed down and the subconscious mind is open to suggestions? Methinks it creates a lot of (subconscious) fear and supporting of the (secure(?)) system, though we know better!
What might be true in this universe might be false in a parallel universe/dimension or another multiverse, when you regard the possibility of different physics, so it may come to flat earth’s, or the possibility of an evil multiverse according to a fellow „psycho“!
According to a fellow „psycho“, there exists an evil universe, whence she saw an evil cat spirit enter through a dimension portal from a purely evil multiverse (maybe its a lower dimensional multiverse). And if there exists an purely good Multivers, maybe something like the afterlife paradise (a maybe higherdimensional multiverse), is this reality (multiverse) the battle/playground/learning place for the forces? Or ist it a place to be conquered by the good forces when you look at history, when even out of evil, arise also mostly good things (regard my unified karma post, hitler – internet), so maybe the good in this world still is not dead but some kind of urge to be fullfilled? So everything’s good somehow?
Let’s begin from a small scale:
Each cell has „motors“ called mitochondria, which were once bacteria. Even sperm cells have them. But when they gain entrance into an egg, the egg makes sure the „motor“ stays outside with the propeller, because the „motor“ has about 37 genes of its own, and the genes in the „motor“ of the egg are selfish. Can’t have any disputes going on 😉 .
So humans and other beings, and with it males, seem to have a feminine (gene-wise) impact. So according to the holograhic principle, also the universe and the god/desses might be very feminine, also regarding the property of giving birth (creating)!
That also might explain man boobs!
If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective (fluxcompensator 😉 ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty, the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown, the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic though it should also be part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc. Is it like nde’ers said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites.