What is normal?
The distinction of normality begins with simple things like, do you drink your beer out of the bottle, or do you pour your beer into a glass and drink from the glass, or simply do you drink beer at all!
People who think that they’re supposed to be perceived misjudgedly, often do not know (are unconscious about) what they do with their feelings, their thoughts and their spiritselves to spiritually sensitive people, and these sensitive people are therfore often thought to be delusional about their perception by these (unconscious system-)people, and so spiritually sensitivepeople get diagnosed as delusional and „psychotic“!
Capitalism and the Disease Paradigm of „Psychosis“
Do you think that because the majority of people consider the capitalist fascist democratic system to be the right one, it really is the wisdom of the last word? Analogously, do you only believe that the majority of psychiatrists and people who believe that a psychosocial disease paradigm of „psychosis“ that is born out of a capitalist fascist democratic world view is right and in the end is the right one?
Sometimes you’re seen as mentally ill when you’re quietly sitting on your couch ruminating and thinkink about life and its meaning and not getting things done, and other times you’re seen as mentally ill when your upbeat, dancing on the streets and talking about seemingly „crazy“ stuff and not getting anything done, but when you’re living an avarege life, working, sleeping, eating, watching telly, fucking and so forth as the system wants you to, you’re deemed normal and healthy!
Is that the opression of the system on „crazy“ people if you’re no performance oriented benefit to the system you get punished and tortured into obeying the system?
Is that the capitalist democratic fascism as executed by the majority on minorities seen in the example of „psychos“?
Is that the difference between an broad path to damnation and the hard rocky road to salvation, Jesus spoke of?
Since the introduction of shock-pictures on tobacco products should mostly have had a dissuasive influnece on people to not use tobacco, but as we know through autogenous training and other psychological/spiritual techniques of selfinfluencing (e.g. meditation on health), repetative, subconscious influences can have an influence on the soul so also on the body (“mind over matter”).
So when you often see shock images of sick people, doesn’t that implicate that after some time of influence on your subconsciousness you somehow are more prone to such sicknesses, though it is shown in studies that tobacco has a positive influence on „schizophrenics“ (the soul)?
What does that say about a psychiatrist repetative storytelling of altered states of consciousness as a sickness and „halucinations“ as not part of reality (but as proposed in other posts and pages being part of some kind of reality)?
What does that say about the repetative storytelling of psychiatrist that neuroleptics help against „symptoms“ through building up over the course of some weeks a level of the agent and after some weeks stopping the „psychosis“, though it is known that the „dopaminblockers“ immediatly enter the neuronal gaps and block the transmittors, and that is said that it saved so much lifes, though we also know that it killed and (spiritually, physically and pschologically) destroyed people, and me also at my first longer encounter with the otherworld i could also without the help of neuroleptics could return to everyday reality after some weeks of alternative help?
Wouldn’t you internalize the role of sick person and therefor feel so, but as i mostly learned to know so called „schizos“ being positive about their initial/first experiences only becoming later negative (ecause of the psychiatrists storytelling and drugs)?
What does that say about the repetitions in the media about dangers from this and that and that a capitalist democratic fascist system is indespensable and without it, we would loose our wealth and security, and that it brought so much advance, but we forget how much destruction and also (psychological and physical) suffering it brought, especially when most of the people relax in front of the tv or other media after a hard days work and so the higher parts of consciousness are closed down and the subconscious mind is open to suggestions?
Methinks it creates a lot of (subconscious) fear and supporting of the (secure(?)) system, though we know better!
Not everything that is possible should also be done!
E.g. GMO-Engineering for some purposes may be useful e.g. healing some sicknesses (where also must be pondered what a sickness is or what an evolutionary trait is [see schizophrenia]), but always take in consideration that it can also be harmful, see some GMO-Food causing cancer or maybe nature being the best designer and trying to create a masterrace when it is seen in bred dogs that they develop sicknesses.
You can always learn from your own mistakes or from others mistakes or compare problems with similar problems or try to think of possible negative future effects, e.g. you don’t have to become an heroin addict to know that it has bad side effects, or e.g. regard nuclear fission, where we should take in consideration, that one time the H2 reserves will be depleted.
Destruction for wisdoms sake
Is it wise to destroy something to find out its purpose? I don’t think so! See particle colliders (black hole?) or maybe the dissection of living animals! Wouldn’t it be nicer if we could use something like an electromeagnetic quantum entanglement measurement apparatus like a tricorder in star trek? Or a gravitational waves radar? IOW science should think forward and “future” test its ideas and inventions, eg fusion energy and its fuel source, water is also not infinitely available on this planet.
IOW is it wise to cast something out of ones mind/world (reductionist) to just find out later it has a pupose!
I got the poison, i got the remedy? Or in other words, is it neccessary to destroy something to prove that it is destroyable or it doesn’t or never existed? Or to make someone / something sick maybe even invent a sickness (GMO), just to prove that it is possible to sicken the related or that such a sickness exists. Or to stage a lie or a theft, just to propagate its “truth” or to gaslight? The problem of lies and evil! Or is it neccessary to build a perfect hell to prove that it exists? And then afterwards you need to heal and repair and rebuild!
The ego! Sometimes you have to restrain yourself! Consideration for others and yourself should be important, nothing is seperate from each other, dreams watching each other narrowly, creation is fragile, some things are impossible…… infinity!
Society and „Psychosis“
So is the polarity and the possible out of it following being-torn-between the identification-based poles of a human being,
the one pole,
the longing for self-development, self-fulfillment and self-awareness (enlightenment),
derived from an evolutionary relevant ego (survival instinct),
that remained in some as some lower levels of degenerative ego states of un-awareness (wild animal me),
because of simply refusing or not-recognizing other life-concept-possibilities, than the harsh ego-centeredness of the limiting wild-animal-me,
and the other pole,
a longing for an identification with a greater purpose, community or maybe a unified consciousness (spiritualized cosmic mind consciousness), another evolutionary concept (herd/group instinct),
a possible source for the psychical disease of human beings, as a part of sick societies, or a so-called “schizophrenic society” in a mass „psychosis“ (trauma through being-torn-between the identification-based poles = loss of spirit).
Possible healing of this condition may come through integrating both poles into life like maybe seen in the „psycohs“ way of integrating everyday reality and the divine world.
One can suffer from all kinds of things, e.g. TV addiction, lack of love, or too much love (clinging) etc. PP, the suffering does not necessarily have to be coupled to extraordinary states of consciousness, and therefore should not be pathologized as illnesses of the psyche but none the less as illnesses of modern western society.
On the other hand in many cultures extraordinary perceptions and states of consciousness are regarded as gifts of a higher power, and thus also regarded of this society as extraordinary, but not as pathological, but of another realm of reality and beneficial for the wellbeing of the society. Only in the West which is strongly marked by (quack)science and a loss of a connection to a supernatural higher power, such states are pathologized, also because of the suffering pressures of some. Such a pressure of suffering is owed to the fact that the people of the West have forgotten to deal with such gifts. Some “Psychos” also intuitively recognize such states of consciousness and perception as part of reality and are often therefore not compliant and refuse to take “meds”. It is also a pity that Western psychiatrists now believe that they have to “spread” their “wisdom” in other cultural circles too!
I call that psychiatric imperialism.
The theory of extraordinary states of consciousness perceiving alternate realities, one can explain that now also with the help of science, namely quantum physics.
What do you think?
Connection between money/capitlism, politics, psychiatry and fascism
Can there be seen a connection between money/capitalism, as they let us work so hard that we get sick (at the moment the „mentally ill“ are estimated by about 49% of the world population by psychiatry),
and psychiatry selecting the weak/sickgotten people out of the herd, and with their neurotoxins shortening lifespan, and rebuilding us to „DIN-norm“ (robot, matserrace) humans (but if we cannot stand the trial we are poisoned and neutred through neurotoxins and psychology),
and politics supporting all that by building nursing homes, workplaces for the disabled (though bacause of the neurotoxins you actually are struggling with work), and psychiatries and forensic psychiatries (unexpected or violent behaviour through braindamage of neurotoxins)?
Is this some kind of fascist agenda to get rid of the weak and build a masterrace?
Thoughts and Fantasies
Where do thoughts and fantasies come from?
Do they come from nothing/ness – nowhere?
If according to my post about nothing/ness, it possibly doesn’t exist but eternity/infinity and according to my post „A propostion regarding creation“ a supernatural cosmic mind created this world and imprinted the spirit information on this energetic/material (and who knows what else!) (?) world, actually everything even thoughts and fantasies should have a root/cause out of the actio = reactio „law“, and because of quantum entanglement (possibly of brain nerve quanta) and a possible supernatural thought transfer (which is not in the hands of science(?)), so that everything’s connected somehow, thoughts and fantasies should have a root in or should be a reflection of some other reality (may it be abstract, spiritual, divine, or who knows what else), parallel universe, another dimension, or another multiverse.
Reality – Fantasy
Could it even be that our fantasies, dreams, and thoughts, are some, or can become some reality in some other dimension or in a parallel universe or in some other multiverse? For example, could there exist a multiverse where the physical laws are such, that there really exists a disc world?
If God is a dreamer or thinker, and all its thoughts which can become our thoughts or vice versa, manifest in a multiverse, there could exist multiverses with totally different laws of physics or maybe no physics at all, maybe only total spiritual realities!
Because the diversity of existence maybe wants to exits somehow, somewhere. (Maybe everything possible is allowed to exist somehow somewhere -> fecundity principle).
(please regard the interconnectedness of everything through different means and my tract about nothing/ness)
Truth or lie? False or right?
What might be true in this universe might be false in a parallel universe/dimension or another multiverse, when you regard the possibility of different physics, so it may come to flat earth’s, or the possibility of an evil multiverse according to a fellow „psycho“!
Some things are impossible or mimus improbable,
like finding out the mystic unfathomable infinite secret of the all-and-all All-mighty Jah Rastafari eternal.
Some spiritualist, maybe even some Buddhists, but at least most of the nde’ers, claim, that thoughts manifest in one form or the other, but mostly in energies or other manifestations of energy (vibrations).
An analogy in science would be that thoughts are quanta states of nerve quanta and can be a waveform (energy), and thus have, through quantum entanglement or electromagnetic induction, an influence on the world and on other people
That is also why a lot of the new age and spiritual and Buddhist etc. people recommend a mindfulness meditation, in order to control oneselves thoughts, and make the world a better place, by not influencing it with negative thoughts.
Maybe we should influence it with positive thoughts, and out of it following positive actions.
Objective versus Subjective Reality
Reductionist science says there should be an objective reality,
a reality that is homogenous to everybody existing in this universe,
but as I came to know most people have their own private psyche/delic (astral/reality) space (s.b.).
As in objective reality includes randomness (e.g. randomness of radioactive decay),
and maybe so (holographic principle) has a randomness in influencing how we perceive reality (=subjective reality),
and objective reality has also an invisible part (we perceive only a fraction of the existing frequencies/smells/sensations/etc. of the rational real world), and so randomness and sensitivity also decide which parts of this invisible world we perceive,
and a multiplicity of realities out of a possibly nonexistent void (s.a.), that could influence our perception, imagination and thoughts according to Quantum entanglement etc. (nerves quanta, etc.) , and so randomness and sensitivity also decide which parts of this invisible world we perceive,
so forms subjective reality and interacts with objective reality, whereas subjective and objective realities alter each other (Quantum entanglement, etc.).
Therefore objective and subjective reality dissolve into one another, and you could say that there’s no distinction between objective and subjective reality, and therefore everything is somehow real that we perceive (at least maybe in some other dimension, parallel universe, multiverse or whatever reality)!
I can imagine that there could exist an almost indescribable reality, which is composed of pure abstract thought form, but not composed of this-worldly energy nor science like structures, like the fathomless Tao (maybe God’s mind?), that somehow materializes in some multiverse.
Let’s assume there’s really a meaning behind everything, maybe god exists, maybe God is love and loves us and therefore sent his masters to show us his love?
But why does God love us? Is love the meaning, and if so, who programmed it into god? And why did the programmer itself cared about that, and the programmer of the programmer, etc…..?
Is there a meaning behind love as a meaning? Why do we or god actually care?
Maybe the only meaning is to smoke MJ so that we get careless and realize that nothing’s actually important and life overvalued?
But what’s the reason for that or the meaning behind all that.
You subscribe meaning to some things maybe also love, but you don’t know if there’s a meaning behind that alleged meaning.
Nde’ers say the meaning of life and death and all is just pure unconditional love, but why? What’s the reason that it is so?
Is the meaning of all that it has no meaning, is it a yin yang principle and therefore Taoism the only realistic philosophy?
View From A Nihilist Peak
Is everything Maya, including enlightenment, the all mighty, love, suffering, etc., or is everything real, or is it both, so that tao is real or is that also just maya. So what is actually important? life? love? the little things? Or are they also just overvalued? Am I now just seeking/craving for attention? Should I kill myself? Does it actually matter what you do?
Is the now/the moment important, since maybe the members of your favorite band will decease one day, and in the next life don’t come back? Is it programmed by the almighty/the universe into us to enjoy the positive and discard the negative? What would be if the negative would be desirable?
Maybe Shiva can fock me in the ass to get enlightened?
I’m probably just seeking attention and am self-indulgent.
Waitin‘ for the man/Godot that would bring me some dr feel good but never comes!?
My angels say they love me any which way.
Baba Ram Dass says that enlightenment takes time and probably won’t come in one lifetime. Is that a bullshit attitude by baba?
Maybe it’s not over yet?
Is the higher self already enlightened?
Then what’s the use of the self itself or the lower self (subconsciousness?)?
Maybe it’s like Douglas Adams said in one of his books that enlightenment is useless, because if somebody groks the meaning of the all-and-all, that it instantly changes its meaning and has then a completely new meaning? So is the search for enlightenment meaningless and futile?
Maybe we just all sit on the porch and love each other?
Tibetan Buddhists say that the basis for enlightenment and madness is the same.
Forgive, forget and allow!
Ok, let’s go before hominids, let’s say apes. They probably created a simple „moral“ system of not injuring each other, because injuring damages the body and is not beneficial for the herd as a connected collective regarding survival, which depends on the health of each other, and that damage is registered as nerve impulses that create a painful feeling in the brain. It’s registered as a negative feeling that hinders survival but what or who or why do we have that instinct for survival (from).
There’s no logical reason for the survival instinct and a fear of death if one dies from natural cause (because there should no pain dying so [of old age])!
Maybe we should go back further and look at hunger pain as a survival pusher, let’s say amoebae or one-cellers.
Did they feel pain when not enough food was around? Why should anyone strive for survival other than pain, and if hunger pain pushed for survival and the fear of death, why did apes fear death, since then probably nobody knew what comes after death?
Did they realize observing their dead relatives that after death there’s maybe nothing left?
Did they strive for immortality, though they also observed death from old age?
Where they irrational?
Did the amoebae realize there’s maybe nothing after death, and if there wasn’t anything after death, why should they long for survival, joy of living? ego?
What programmed a joy for living in us?
Positive feelings of the amoebae of getting nutrition?
Why the positiv feelings?
There comes again the question of survival into the game, etc.!
Where’s the logical reason for simple creatures for a survival instinct?
Maybe logic is a fallacy, but if it is correct, what or who tells us that it is of reality?
Maybe the survival instinct derives from the notion of a not fulfilled heavenly mission (compare to stories on NDE’s), and the urge to fulfill said mission?
Atheists and Afterlife
Atheists say something like, that God and the afterlife are illusions and a crutch for those about to die or those who can’t stand the thought of personal, final, irrevocable extinction. Cowards, in other words.
But I say:
I think that atheists are the real cowards taking refuge in an extinction, because they are afraid to meet such principles as infinity, and eternity, and the afterlife, and with that, not taking responsibility for their lives, and facing their personal karma.
Total freedom or Total detachment, free will and the special case of Nagualism
Freedom actually means that you are capable of living your life according to your free will, that including such things as to do good acts as well as “evil” acts, according to your free will.
But is there actually existing a free will comparing it to maybe random numbers falling into Gaus’ normal distribution? How can you actually prove that random numbers don’t follow a pattern given by higher intelligence, despite Gauss’ normal distribution, or that you have free will and not follow a “cosmic” plan?
(compare: Isaiah 45:7 “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.”)
So now the Nagualists follow a goal of total freedom in following the Eagles (spirit) plan impeccably, but also bending the Eagles will and actually doing what they like, refusing alien energy, and not interacting too much with the world, and at the end defeating death and becoming in this act energy beings, that live millions of years kinda autonomously of their own energy and don’t take of the universes infinite energy.
Is that kind of a total detachment (not interacting with the world and refusing alien energy, though actually everything’s somehow connected if you want it or not), or total freedom, or free will, if they bend the Eagles will, or is that also the Eagles will.
So their goal is total freedom which ends in being an energy being, and at the total end dissolve because out of lack of energy.
But if according to Nagualism an average human being dissolves anyway at death and is eaten by the eagle and has also free will,
so then what difference does it make how you live,
and maybe all the other spiritualists are right that you’re an infinite and eternal soul/spirit that acts according to its karma?
Carlos Castaneda Nagual
Nagual in indigenous Mexican language means black magic sorcerer,
and Carlos Castaneda gave himself the title of „spiritual“ (lol) leader (<- „nagual“),
which in essence means black magic leader,
because there is no spirituality in torturing, killing, raping and annihilation with/of black magic.
Carlos Castaneda the psychiatrists over sixer, worked in a psychiatry and probably got his ideas for his books from there and the rest is all lies and jest!
Absolute and Total Freedom
What should that mean?
It probably means freedom from God, from Spirit etc.,
and the freedom from the self and energy and soul,
and freedom to do do what you like and freedom from what you like to do what you like,
and freedom from freedom and freedom from everything and nothing.
Maybe if you look at freedom from self,
it means in the end total dissolution, but maybe also freedom from that,
maybe there is no total freedom, because total freedom means also freedom from total freedom!
Where freedom lies
Freedom doesn’t mean, to destroy everything or adjust in ones favor.
Freedom probably means, mutual adjustment without a leadership (culture)!
AND freedom isn’t for free it at least contains the responsibility of karma.
If you consider force and control and power over situations or people or dreams or whatever, may it be in supernatural ways or other, as I experienced it by others, done onto me, as black magic, maybe Carlos Castaneda’s view is right and everything normal people or god do is also black magic, because everybody’s got some power anyway, even if it is only the power of love! But Carlos Castaneda was not right, Love is the greatest joyful force there is, and God si no black magician!
Capitalist Agenda (Arbeit macht Frei)
Stands the notion of the capitalist free market idea of gainful employment behind some dark agenda, that is propagated as being the only possible kind of meaningful occupation, that goes in a lot of countries as far as forcing people to work as slave-wage-workers, if they want to receive further/future benefits of the ruthless capitalist society system, but if you decide to live on alms, you are an objective to repression, be it from fascists, which don’t like low life, or capitalist governments, which want you to drive out of inner cities, in order not to disturb the „ideal“ of prosperity.
Does it go as so far, that through a torturous and sickness bringing performance oriented hard gainful work and out of it oftentimes following death the idea of freedon through work was born, if not so, that you have pay for your old age pension freedom with enslavement through performance oriented hard work?
Why did the capitalists stole Nicola Tesla’s patents and destroyed his work, of free infinite energy, and therefore the possibility of a by now already available dupli/replicator, so that we by now already have had a money-free and therefor gainful employment based free society and already been engaging in meaningful social, spiritual etc. etc. etc. work.
Is my theory of the immortals (existence theory supported by Taoism, nagualism and the bible), and them living of our life energy (chi), like when I experienced when getting money from atm’s that at the same time there was a „source“ drawing energy (chi) from me.
Are these immortals simply lazy or afraid of facing their karma when they die out of lack of stolen energy?
What did they do?
What is their agenda?
Or better what do they want to do?
Do they wait for the physical incarnation of the eternal/infinite manifestation of the Almighty in order to destroy this avatar and so the all-and-all and install an inversion of being and be like the anti-god in an inversion of being in the all-and-all?
Are they so bored of life or were they beaten as children or what happened or is the almighty simply crazy for allowing such, or are the Hindus or the nagualists right that the all-and-all wants to get enlightened by experiencing everything possible and impossible, but if everything’s infinite and eternal does anything actually matter?
Regarding the fact that I dreamt into a parallel universe where the president of earth has been Adolf Hitler (maybe without killing Jews), and the philosophical thought experiment, that we could be brains attached to a virtual reality by mad scientist, is it possible that this mad scientist (God) (also regarding the competition principle of evolution and capitalist societies [maybe see the game civilization]) just watches us like snails in a snail rat-race which philosophy or thought concepts will win.
I think the almighty is nuttier than me.
Or is it simply the fecundity philosophy principle and we’re stuck in a war multiverse like the nagualists prophecied or like it is seen in the daily struggle we have like getting up or fighting a cold?
An evil Multiverse?
Is this multiversal ir/reality evil or a war/chaos/struggle/hellish ir/reality, when you consider all beings here on earth struggle/fight one way or the other with sicknesses or nature (brutal eat or be eaten ir/reality) or other means of daily life and a holographic principle refers that to the whole multiverse?
Is this light love god, that reincarnates into all, evil (Yehovah – Lucifer angel of light), when you consider that love also can hurt (e.g. demons/dark beings [ see NDE’s]) when too much (clinging) or not enough.
Or hate does hurt the „good“!
I had this thought/vision that maybe an evil entity had to be cast out of a purely good multiverse alone into this isolated hellish prison/hell multiverse where it reincarnates from eternities of eternities, in many forms, as some kind of punishment to look into his own evil eye!
But as maybe the holographic principle might grip and forgiveness and love is part of this or a greater ir/reality, maybe, but just maybe, this entity will be forgiven one day or maybe not?
Is the answer to love/embrace everything also evil?
But in this act evil becoming accepted and still living on?
According to a fellow „psycho“, there exists an evil universe, whence she saw an evil cat spirit enter through a dimension portal from a purely evil multiverse (maybe its a lower dimensional multiverse).
And if there exists an purely good Multivers, maybe something like the afterlife paradise (a maybe higherdimensional multiverse), is this reality (multiverse) the battle/playground/learning place for the forces?
Or ist it a place to be conquered by the good forces when you look at history, when even out of evil, arise also mostly good things (regard my unified karma post, hitler – internet), maybe also regard natural bushfires that clean the old plants out so provide space for yound plants and provide more food for e.g. birds, so maybe the good in this world still is not dead but some kind of urge to be fullfilled?
So everything’s good somehow?
You all come from light! I’ve seen it! (a little excursus)
Is there more than light and darkness?
In quantum science thinking there are more than ones and zero, that no and yes, there is also a „maybe“, and maybe there is more than the quantum realistic thinking!
Are we all the light that wants to be enlightened?
Light is energy, and energy is matter, and that is life, and everything springs from love also life.
A saint once said everything was made of love, EVERYTHING(!),
(see also Isaiah 45: 7 „I make the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.“)
(god is light/love)
and God „beats“ (gives crises / life tasks) his beloved children in order to evolve,
even evil was made of love!
In the bible is written that you have to „overcome“ (mistakes) (excuse yourself at god, etc.), if you have done something bad you can reincarnate to make it right again, but you can also act out of the spiritual world as angel or spirit to straighten out your mistakes!
You might wanna open your heart to the light not only your mind / consciousness (or vice versa) then you’ll understand it better!
What is light without love?
Warriors of light and energy and fire and the weapons of mass destruction of darkness are warriors of the Kraack!
If Jesus said that you should hold your other cheek, and Ghandi (or was it Brecht?) said eye for an eye will make the whole world blind, and Jesus fulfilled the old testaments laws that if you sew wind then you will reap storm (John’s Revelation?), by saying hold the other cheek, then maybe God says (if you don’t leave my children in peace) that I will strike with furious anger those who poison and hurt my sons and daughters and brothers and sisters souls (Psalms).
Power over people and the Power of love
Can the power over people be compared with the power of love? Are these the two sides of a coin? Like power over people is very tempting and egoistic and easily abused, while the power of love is very altruistic and giving and can be unconditional. Where does abuse come into play and can a negative power also include something positive? AND, can a positive power include also something negative?
Is maybe the power of love so pure and overwhelming and can’t be compared to dark power over people that it will overcome the yin – yang – Tao principle and install a pure light love multiverse, maybe compared to the struggle/war universe paradigm where actually the daily struggle can be beautiful and joyful and be a form of love, like seen in the joy of running. Like compared to NDE’ers insights and the lord’s prayer, that heaven is pure love and Jesus saying „thy will shall be done as in heaven so on earth“?
Enlightened ones and politics and spirituality
Is an enlightened one allowed or supposed to engage in politics and spirituality?
It seems as if politics and spirituality are both hindrances to true awakening. The yogi becomes enlightened when he drops the content of not only the human side of things but all facets related to it, including politics and spirituality.
But if a yogi dropped the content of not only the human side of things but all facets related to it, including politics and spirituality and became enlightened, a lot of them play what is called the guru game. A truly awakened one understands that most, if not all, of his followers will never attain an awakened state so they give them practices like mantras, mudras, asanas, meditations and so on to placate their desire for awakening, which is another chink in the armor, so to speak, since the desire to become enlightened is yet another hindrance to attainment.
But isn’t enlightenment part of spirituality or the other way around, spirituality part of enlightenment?
Regarding political activism of enlightened ones, maybe they should engage in politics since they could also be the objective of repression even torture and death when you look at the current uprising of fascism. Methinks even if you are totally detached from suffering or reality or whatever, you should also acknowledge the fact that methinks, ending of suffering is a goal of enlightenment, as seen in the awakened Buddha, and so the ending of possibly changeable outer circumstances should also be considered by enlightened as a goal.
Is the all-and-all a little more feminine than masculine?
Let’s begin from a small scale:
Each cell has „motors“ called mitochondria, which were once bacteria. Even sperm cells have them. But when they gain entrance into an egg, the egg makes sure the „motor“ stays outside with the propeller, because the „motor“ has about 37 genes of its own, and the genes in the „motor“ of the egg are selfish. Can’t have any disputes going on 😉 .
So humans and other beings, and with it, males, seem to have a feminine (gene-wise) impact. So according to the holographic principle, also the universe and the gods/goddesses might be very feminine, also regarding the property of giving birth (creating)!
That also might explain man boobs!
Gauss‘ Normal Distribution and Free Will
Is the cosmic background radiation/the white noise random?
Could it be used to create random numbers?
Therefore is the nature of the multiverse (interconnectedness principle) random?
Is the existence of the universe random, or does it, due to the holographic principle and the normal distribution, fall into a certain probability?
And the randomness maybe applies to parallel universes or multiverses and some single aspects of the universe?
Normally, due to the stochastic nature of radiation, it should fall into Gauss‘ normal distribution of stochastic with a normal random exception of it.
Could you now somehow compare that to free will and determinism, according to the holographic universe paradigm?
Like a part of your life is determined by the wishes you made before birth (see NDE’s) (resembling Gauss‘ normal distribution) and the other part of your life you can choose free will (resembling randomness within Gauss‘ normal distribution)!
Ego versus self-importance
I don’t know if ego can be related to a sense of self-importance, since self-importance can have a component of humbleness in my opinion, becuse since you know that according to nde’ers, everybody is precious and important and loved by the almighty and the angels and the holies and the spirits, and everybody has a special mission, so a component of humbleness might accompany such a feeling in my experience, because of the unconditional love and grace you receive from Jah, which is very humbling, but ego maybe something different, maybe putting oneself always in the first place.
You shouldn’t lie,
but try to say the truth,
but if it hurts it is allowed to tell white lies for peace and loves sake,
but no white lies for evils sake.
Maybe some things that are stated philosophically, spiritually or in real life should be interpreted, like I learned from NDE’s for sacred texts (interpretation receiving through prayers and meditation), or like I learned for statements from little children and people (interpretation through empathy, intuition and „fantasizing“ the truth), who don’t want to tell the real truth, because they’re afraid of badmouthing/psychical punishment and psychical/physical pain therefrom, but decipher it in metaphors and white lies to save themselves from badmouthing.
Is the statement „If you want to achieve something you have to work really hard!“ overemphasized/overvalued?
Maybe it is easy to avoid hard mental work, by just plugging into the cosmic mind, where the all-an-all info is stored, and receiving your information from there, without breaking your head.
Or maybe it would be easy to avoid hard physical work, in order to support your physical survival, if we could like Jesus make miracles and multiply our „fish“. (Or simply just build a dupli/replicator).
Or is the path to such a state of grace also hard work, like maybe following your angel’s guidance, and with it occurring fearful and dangerous situations that you must overcome?
Or will you never be led into difficult situations by your angels?
Or a bad example like black magicians do black magic, in order to manipulate people so they can accumulate wealth.
Does that also require hard work or is such the broad easy path to condemnation that Jesus spoke of?
Maybe an important number, four, like the four spiritual elements, fire, water, earth, and air, or the four cardinal directions and maybe the four divine qualities of spirituality, kindness, love, compassion, and forgiveness or like the four seasons.
Perfection and Imperfection
If we never could reach an ultimate high state of being, including its absolute perfection, because you can always head for higher states of being (see the concept of infinity) and more perfection.
Are we therefore all already perfect per se, because we are all part of the all-and-all, and is the all-and-all perfect in itself, because it is composed of the “perfection” (god) as well as the “imperfection”, and of course us perfect/imperfect people (love people, animal people, human people, angel people, stone/earth people, fire/water/air people, plant people, bacteria people, virus people, etc…..). ❤
There’s a saying (I don’t know from where): „All paths lead to Rome“, which means there are as many truths as there are people, or as many Taos or buddha natures as people are, or as many paths lead to love, methinks Baba Ram Dass or someone similar said „Everything’s perfect and so are you!“.
As it goes for the yin – yang – Tao, it might need some calibration, to find a peaceful equilibrium.
Tao and so on
If the fathomless Tao is the source of all, what created the Tao and what created that creator, and on and on?
You could philosophize about that endlessly.
Lets’s say infinity/eternity is just there to enjoy it, so let’s get out on the balcony under the night sky and have a beer or a coffee or a splif or a ciggie or a glass of water, and let the all-and-all guide and let the spirit flow throug you, and enjoy the night.